The true cost of what we eat


Across the globe, farmers are exploited by giant conglomerates making eye-watering amounts of money from food production. But what is the true cost of food that comes from unsustainable sources where deforestation and extinction are caused by consumerism?

The rising cost of food – cheaper is more expensive!

We all grumble at the rising cost of food in times where austerity is rife and wages are not in line with inflation. Whilst we chunter to ourselves in the supermarket aisles, many of us don’t realise the true price of unsustainable food: a price that costs the environment, costs animals’ lives and costs humans their rights. It is so far removed from our consumer habits we don’t stop to consider what our want of falling food prices really entails.

The hidden costs include: 
  • agricultural-driven deforestation
  • extinction
  • perpetuation of gender inequalities
  • exploitation 
  • habitat loss for animals and humans.

The sad reality is, our current food production methods also risk passing costs on to future generations who will have diet-related diseases, deforestation, soil degradation, extinction and climate change to contend with.

What is unsustainable food?

Unsustainable food production means the mass production of products without considering the impact. Whilst food giants negate responsibility, mass production, distribution and consumption of unsustainable foods are causing significant damage to the environment, public health, biodiversity and rural communities.

The true cost to humans.

Across the globe, men, women and children toil to drive consumerism forward. In poorer countries, governments often allow powerful corporations to take land that indigenous people have used for centuries for their own financial gain.

The global palm oil industry has been linked to many human rights violations with children, in particular, suffering hugely. As plantations expand, habitat loss expands and many people are forced into working for the very plantations that destroy their homes.  With an area the size of 300 football fields of rain forest cleared every hour, the production of palm oil certainly has a lot to answer for. People are forced to work in degradation, earning barely enough for themselves and their families to survive. Instead of sustaining their lives, the palm oil industry makes them reliant and they are vulnerable to drops in the world market, meaning wages are not consistent or equal.

Palm oil is found in many household products such as: washing detergents, confectionery, toothpaste, cosmetics, cleaning products and baked goods. because they appear in so many products, boycotting it will be extremely difficult. To protect people from harsh working conditions and illness in the future, governments will need to work harder to protect the human rights of many around the world suffering as palm oil production increases.


Ghana where palm oil production is purported to be sustainable


Ghana believes they have a solution and Serendipalm state they use farmers on pre-cultivated land who also grow crops. If this is the case, the rest of the world needs to take note, and quickly.  It sounds so simple so why aren't other countries following suit? A workable sustainable solution for producing palm oil also means  it can also be done with many other products like coffee.

The global coffee market isn’t any more sustainable than palm oil. Worth US$50 billion per year, some of the coffee farmers earn as little as 3 cents for their efforts. There is no excuse for this greed. It is second only to oil as a trading commodity, yet human rights are being subjugated by an industry affluent enough already across Africa, Central and South America and Asia.


The true cost to the environment.

Over in Brazil, said to be the most bio-diverse country in the world, food production is causing catastrophic damage to the environment. The 158,000 hectare Serra Ricardo Franco Park is meant to be a conservation area for rare wildlife.  Instead, it is being stripped of trees to create pasture for hundreds of thousands of cattle that surround ranches.

Farming where a forest should be. Photo courtesy of Jon Watts, The Observer.

Amidst claims of corruption and bribery, it is surrounded by controversy instead of trees.  It was originally planned to be 400,000 hectares with an agreed loan of $205million, mainly from the World Bank. The Mato Grosso government promised to spend the funds on vehicles, staff training and research.  The reality is much of the land has been cleared by farmers for cattle and soy fields. Little research has been conducted and in many areas scientists and eco-tourists require keys from farmers who have claimed the land.

Farmers argue they were there legally long before the plans for the conservation area and they won’t be compensated for leaving. With more farmers moving cattle into the park, who is legal and who is illegal is becoming a bigger issue and many legal battles have ensued.

As the cleared areas grows, so do Brazil’s carbon emissions with 2/3 of them coming from that area. Last year, they more than doubled their annual allowance of forest clearance that they promised to reduce by 2020. They also halved their environment budget for the year even though a 29% increase in deforestation was reported.

JBS are one meat company buying cattle from inside the park despite calls not to source cattle from illegally cleared areas. They are now accused of a fuluginous corruption scandal of silencing witnesses in an attempt to repair their damaged reputation.

It is interesting that many politicians own land inside the park. These powerful land owners want the park abolished and forest protection reductions happen regularly, imbuing negative effects on the forest and its water sources.  Thousands of species including monkeys, armadillos and pink dolphins are at risk.
The home of monkeys, panthers and pumas, Phil Clarke Hill, Getty Images
 It is said that even Donald Trump is cashing in on the area – not surprising for someone who denies the existence of global warming and has introduced pro-hunting laws on bears and wolves. The more trees that disappear, the less oxygen is produced and global warming will continue to increase as more greenhouse gases are produced.


This is also a worrying problem in Indonesia which has lost  lost 76 million hectares of forest in the last 25 years. With the pace of destruction of our forests and the proliferation of greenhouse gases, they won’t be around for corporations to pillage in the next hundred years. The use of ‘slash and burn’ agriculture where trees are cut down and burnt emits substantial amounts of smoke into the atmosphere. It comes as no surprise that Indonesia is now one of the world’s leading countries of greenhouse gas emissions.
The devastating effect of palm oil production
Around the world, deforestation has also been known to cause erosion and sedimentation. The more trees are cut down, the more forest soil is exposed to sunlight which then dries out. Trees support the water cycle and place water vapour back in the atmosphere; with less trees comes less water, hence forest areas become barren wastelands. Temperatures are ow changing creating disruption to the flora and fauna in these areas.

The Paris Climate Agreement will have some impact on this devastation but more countries need to take more serious measures to reverse this damage. Sustainable solutions urgently need to be implemented before they disappear forever and take many species of animal with them.

The true cost to animals

Thousands of species of animals around the globe are at threat of extinction due to industrialised food produce. 80% of land animals and plants live in forests.  Many of these cannot survive away from the forest: in Indonesia alone, a third of all mammals are on the ‘critically endangered’ list.

In Borneo and Sumatra, 300,000 species are at risk of death, injury and displacement as forests are destroyed for palm oil production. With it comes an increased accessibility for poachers and smugglers to reach iconic species like the orang-utan. With 90% of their habitat gone, they are at serious threat despite being good for the forests they inhabit as they provide the only way to germinate certain seeds which have travelled through their gut.

Orang-utans are being attacked with guns and machetes and others are buried alive. Young are snatched from their mothers and sold as pets; some are sent to entertainment parks across Asia. Their suffering is not just a conservation issue but an animal welfare one.
Orang-utans suffer from welfare and conservation issues
Due to roads being created by palm oil plantations, other species are also being poached far more easily: sun bears, clouded leopards and pygmy elephants are just a few of the species at serious risk.

It isn’t just forest animals whose survival is in jeopardy; marine wildlife is also greatly at risk. Thanks to a growing demand in unsustainable fishing, totoaba swim bladders - said to be more valuable than cocaine – mean totoaba and the vaquita porpoise are now threatened with extinction. Vaquita are the perfect size to become entangled in the gill nets used to kill totoaba. When this happens, they drown. With less than 30 vaquita left in the Gulf of California, desperate attempts to prevent extinction are in place.

It is thought there are now less than 30 vaquita left

The Mexican government has tightened up on fishing laws and put bans in place but with so few now left, unless they are removed from the area it is likely they won’t last the rest of this year.

But, the Chinese, who are willing to pay up to US$100,000 per kilo of swim bladder, have such an influential power over the rest of the world that their consumer habits will cause more damage before they start if improve; if they improve at all.

Still want cheaper food?

Now you know the true cost of your food, do you still want to purchase mass-produced, cheap food? The unsustainable methods of food production are one of the most destructive issues facing our planet today. Every day it continues brings us a day closer to the death of large areas on our planet. As consumers, we can influence if this continues or ends.

In my next blog, I will take you through how to be more sustainable next time you go shopping and how you really can influence a food industry that is killing our planet slowly. Visit one of the links below to find out more about the damaging effects of unsustainable food produce.

http://sustainablefoodtrust.org/key-issues/true-cost- accounting/

 https://campaign.worldvision.com.au/wp- content/uploads/2014/03/7280_DTL_Factsheet_Coffee_Web_Single.pdf

 http://www.saynotopalmoil.com/theissue

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/deforestation/


Comments

  1. Good article Liz, let's hope it enlightens people to shop more Eco consciously.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rare black servals caught on camera!

Big cats face BIG trouble